ASSOCIAÇÕES ENTRE A PERCEPÇÃO DOS SERVIÇOS ECOSSISTÊMICOS E O BEM-ESTAR EM PARQUES URBANOS

Carlos Eduardo Menezes da Silva; Anselmo César Vasconcelos Bezerra; Claudiano Carneiro Cruz Neto

doi:10.15628/holos.2025.15780

Autores

Carlos Eduardo Menezes da Silva Instituto Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-156X
Anselmo César Vasconcelos Bezerra Instituto Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0722-9417
Claudiano Carneiro Cruz Neto Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4307-570X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15628/holos.2025.15780

Palavras-chave:

Serviços Ecossistêmicos, Espaço Verde Urbano, ``Planejamento Urbano, Cidades Sustentáveis

Resumo

Os benefícios dos Serviços Ecossistêmicos para o bem-estar têm sido estudados sob diferentes perspectivas. Uma delas é a relação com as áreas verdes urbanas. Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar associações entre a percepção de serviços ecossistêmicos culturais e o bem-estar entre usuários de um conjunto de parques urbanos. Foram aplicados 481 formulários com usuários de dez parques urbanos da cidade do Recife, Brasil. Os resultados mostraram que quanto melhor a autopercepção em relação à saúde mental e níveis de estresse, maior a percepção sobre os benefícios dos serviços ecossistêmicos providos pelos parques. Além disso, foi evidenciado que uma maior aceitação da Disposição a Pagar (DAP) por melhorias nos parques foi correlacionada com uma melhor percepção dos serviços ecossistêmicos. Os achados sugerem que os usuários dos parques urbanos da metrópole estudada conhecem os benefícios dos serviços ecossistêmicos, associando-os à melhoria do bem-estar e da qualidade ambiental urbana. Esses resultados podem servir de subsídio para que os tomadores de decisão incorporem o valor dos serviços ecossistêmicos nas estratégias de planejamento urbano

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Carlos Eduardo Menezes da Silva, Instituto Federal de Pernambuco

Professor do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco - IFPE, Biólogo e Tecnólogo em Gestão Ambiental, Mestre em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente pelo PRODEMA/UFPE, Doutorando em Economia pela Universidade de Brasília - UnB, certificado em Valoração e Pesquisas Domiciliares pelo Centro Agronômico Tropical de Investigação e Ensino da Costa Rica - CATIE, e em Gestão Ambiental pela Universidade da Califórnia/Berkeley, com atuação na área de Conservação dos Recursos Naturais com ênfase em Economia Ambiental

Anselmo César Vasconcelos Bezerra, Instituto Federal de Pernambuco

Professor do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco (IFPE) nos cursos de Gestão Ambiental e Licenciatura em Geografia (Graduação) e Sustentabilidade Urbana e Educação Ambiental (Pós-graduação). Atualmente desenvolve pesquisas sobre as relações entre saúde, ambiente e território com ênfase no ambiente urbano. É membro pesquisador dos grupos: Ecologia e Análises Socioambientais; Geografia para a Promoção da Saúde e do INCT Observatório das Metrópoles. Também desenvolve trabalhos de extensão com educação ambiental e saúde em comunidades tradicionais. Participa de conselhos interinstitucionais na área ambiental no Estado de Pernambuco. Tem interesse nas áreas: Geografia da Saúde, Políticas Públicas, Estudos Urbanos, Conflitos Socioambientais e Vigilância em Saúde Ambiental.

Claudiano Carneiro Cruz Neto, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia

Economista (2006) e, mestre em Desenvolvimento Regional e Meio Ambiente pela Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (2009), e Doutor em Economia (Área de concentração Economia do Meio Ambiente) pela Universidade de Brasília (2018). Atualmente é Professor Adjunto na Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia. Suas pesquisas ocorrem principalmente nos temas: Economia dos Recursos Naturais; Valoração Econômica bens e serviços ecossistêmicos.

Referências

Abraham, I. A., Sunday, I. B., Saulawa, S. B., & Abubakar, U. A. (2022). Public perception on environmental noise pollution : A case study in Zaria city , Kaduna state , Nigeria. Environmental Health Engineering and Management, 9(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.34172/EHEM.2022.15

Aizaki, H., Nakatani, T., & Sato, K. (2015). Stated Preference Methods Using R (1st ed.). CRC PRESS-TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP.

Akpinar, A. (2016). How is quality of urban green spaces associated with physical activity and health? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 16, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.01.011

AMATO-LOURENÇO, L. F., MOREIRA, T. C. L., ARANTES, B. L. DE, FILHO, D. F. D. S., & MAUAD, T. (2016). Metrópoles, cobertura vegetal, áreas verdes e saúde. Estudos Avançados, 30(86), 113–130.

Asah, S. T., Guerry, A. D., Blahna, D. J., & Lawler, J. J. (2014). Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: Human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications. Ecosystem Services, 10, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.003

Ayala-Azcárraga, C., Diaz, D., & Zambrano, L. (2019). Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189(April), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.005

Barton, H., & Grant, M. (2013). Urban planning for healthy cities a review of the progress of the european healthy cities programme. Journal of Urban Health, 90(SUPPL 1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3

Berney, R. (2010). Learning from Bogotá: How municipal experts transformed public space. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502344

RESOLUÇÃO No 510, DE 7 DE ABRIL DE 2016., 1 (2016) (testimony of BRASIL).

Camargo, D. M., Ramírez, P. C., Quiroga, V., Ríos, P., Férmino, R. C., & Sarmiento, O. L. (2018). Physical activity in public parks of high and low socioeconomic status in Colombia using observational methods. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 15(8), 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2017-0318

Cariñanos, P., Casares-Porcel, M., Díaz de la Guardia, C., Aira, M. J., Belmonte, J., Boi, M., Elvira-Rendueles, B., De Linares, C., Fernández-Rodriguez, S., Maya-Manzano, J. M., Pérez-Badía, R., Rodriguez-de la Cruz, D., Rodríguez-Rajo, F. J., Rojo-Úbeda, J., Romero-Zarco, C., Sánchez-Reyes, E., Sánchez-Sánchez, J., Tormo-Molina, R., & Vega Maray, A. M. (2017). Assessing allergenicity in urban parks: A nature-based solution to reduce the impact on public health. Environmental Research, 155(September 2016), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.015

Chen, W. Y., Aertsens, J., Liekens, I., Broekx, S., & De Nocker, L. (2014). Impact of perceived importance of ecosystem services and stated financial constraints on willingness to pay for riparian meadow restoration in Flanders (Belgium). Environmental Management, 54(2), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0293-z

Cheung, L. T. O., Ma, A. T. H., Wong, G. K. L., Lo, A. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2022). Perceived benefits, negative impacts, and willingness-to-pay to improve urban green space. Geographical Research, March, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12549

Crane, M., Lloyd, S., Haines, A., Ding, D., Hutchinson, E., Belesova, K., Davies, M., Osrin, D., Zimmermann, N., Capon, A., Wilkinson, P., & Turcu, C. (2021). Transforming cities for sustainability: A health perspective. Environment International, 147(December 2020), 106366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106366

del Saz Salazar, S., & García Menéndez, L. (2007). Estimating the non-market benefits of an urban park: Does proximity matter? Land Use Policy, 24(1), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.011

Duan, Y., Wagner, P., Zhang, R., Wulff, H., & Brehm, W. (2018). Physical activity areas in urban parks and their use by the elderly from two cities in China and Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178(May), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.06.009

Dziba, L., Erpul, G., Fazel, A., Fischer, M., & Hernández, A. M. (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Issue May 2019).

Fávero, L. P. (2015). Análise de dados: Modelos de regressão com EXCEL, STATA e SPSS (1st ed.). Elsevier.

Geng, D. (Christina), Innes, J., Wu, W., & Wang, G. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: a global analysis. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(2), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01249-w

Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., Lange, A., & Donovan, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2 SUPPL. 2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018

Haaland, C., & van den Bosch, C. K. (2015). Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(4), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009

Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1. Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. In R. Haines-Young & M. Potschin (Eds.), Fabis Consulting (V5.1, Issue January, p. 53). https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf

Honeck, E., Gallagher, L., Arx, B. Von, Lehmann, A., Wyler, N., Villarrubia, O., Guinaudeau, B., & Schlaepfer, M. A. (2021). Integrating ecosystem services into policymaking – A case study on the use of boundary organizations. Ecosystem Services, 49(October 2020), 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101286

IBGE, I. B. D. G. E. E. (2019). Perfil dos Municípios Brasileiros (2019th ed.). IBGE. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101668

Keeler, B. L., Hamel, P., McPhearson, T., Hamann, M. H., Donahue, M. L., Meza Prado, K. A., Arkema, K. K., Bratman, G. N., Brauman, K. A., Finlay, J. C., Guerry, A. D., Hobbie, S. E., Johnson, J. A., MacDonald, G. K., McDonald, R. I., Neverisky, N., & Wood, S. A. (2019). Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature. Nature Sustainability, 2(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1

Kendall, M., Kothencz, G., Stahl-Timmins, W., & Thornes, J. (2014). Atmospheric Resource Impact Assessment (ARIA): An inventory for evaluating ecosystem services derived from the atmosphere. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 38(4), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314538719

Keniger, L. E., Gaston, K. J., Irvine, K. N., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(3), 913–935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913

Lai, H., Flies, E. J., Weinstein, P., & Woodward, A. (2019). The impact of green space and biodiversity on health. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(7), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2077

Latinopoulos, D., Mallios, Z., & Latinopoulos, P. (2016). Valuing the benefits of an urban park project: A contingent valuation study in Thessaloniki, Greece. Land Use Policy, 55, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.020

Liu, H., Remme, R. P., Hamel, P., Nong, H., & Ren, H. (2020). Supply and demand assessment of urban recreation service and its implication for greenspace planning-A case study on Guangzhou. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203(October 2019), 103898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103898

Liu, R., & Xiao, J. (2021). Factors affecting users’ satisfaction with urban parks through online comments data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010253

Londe, P. R., & Mendes, P. C. (2014). A Influência das Áreas Verdes na Qualidade de Vida Urbana. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Médica e Da Saúde, 10(18), 264–272. http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/hygeia%5Cnhttp://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/hygeia/article/viewFile/26487/14869

Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2001). Regression models for categorical dependent variables, using Stata. (1st ed.). Stata Press. https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-3933-2-4

Lopez-Feldman, A. (2012). Introduction to contingent valuation using Stata. In MPRA Paper (No. 41018; MPRA, Issue 41018). http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41018/

López-Mosquera, N., & Sánchez, M. (2011). Emotional and satisfaction benefits to visitors as explanatory factors in the monetary valuation of environmental goods. An application to periurban green spaces. Land Use Policy, 28(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.008

Mak, B. K. L., & Jim, C. Y. (2019). Linking park users’ socio-demographic characteristics and visit-related preferences to improve urban parks. Cities, 92(July 2017), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.008

Marselle, M. R., Stadler, J., Korn, H., Irvine, K. N., & Bonn, A. (2019). Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change: Perspectives for Science, Policy and Practice. In Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change (’1). SPRINGER NATURE. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02318-8_20

Meneses, A. R. S. de. (2018). Desafios da gestão dos parques urbanos de Recife [Universidade Federal de Pernambuco]. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/33408

Mertes, J. D., & Hall, J. R. (1996). Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines (3a ed.). American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration.

Mexia, T., Vieira, J., Príncipe, A., Anjos, A., Silva, P., Lopes, N., Freitas, C., Santos-Reis, M., Correia, O., Branquinho, C., & Pinho, P. (2018). Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass. Environmental Research, 160(October 2017), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023

Montes-Pulido, C., & Forero, V. F. (2021). Cultural ecosystem services and disservices in an urban park in Bogota, Colombia | Serviços ecossistêmicos culturais e desserviços num parque urbano em Bogotá, Colombia | Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y diservicios en un parque urbano de Bogotá, Colo. Ambiente e Sociedade, 24, 1–20.

Nath, T. K., Zhe Han, S. S., & Lechner, A. M. (2018). Urban green space and well-being in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 36(October), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.013

Nawrath, M., Elsey, H., & Dallimer, M. (2022). Why cultural ecosystem services matter most: Exploring the pathways linking greenspaces and mental health in a low-income country. Science of the Total Environment, 806, 150551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150551

Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description-the poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52

Parra-Saldívar, A., Abades, S., Celis-Diez, J. L., & Gelcich, S. (2020). Exploring perceived well-being from urban parks: Insights from a megacity in latin America. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(18), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187586

Payne, L. L., Mowen, A. J., & Orsega-Smith, E. (2002). An examination of park preferences and behaviors among urban residents: The role of residential location, race and age. Leisure Sciences, 24(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400252900149

Pereira, P., Inácio, M., Karnauskaitė, D., Bogdzevič, K., Gomes, E., Kalinauskas, M., & Barcelo, D. (2022). Nature based solutions impacts on urban environment chemistry: Air, soil and water. In & P. P. C. S. S. Ferreira, Z. Kalantari, T. Hartmann (Ed.), Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation (pp. 79–137). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2021_760.

Pinto, L. V., Inácio, M., Ferreira, C. S. S., Ferreira, A. D., & Pereira, P. (2022). Ecosystem services and well-being dimensions related to urban green spaces – A systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society Journal, 85(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104072

Reyes-Riveros, R., Altamirano, A., De La Barrera, F., Rozas-Vásquez, D., Vieli, L., & Meli, P. (2021). Linking public urban green spaces and human well-being: A systematic review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 61(September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127105

Riechers, M., Noack, E. M., & Tscharntke, T. (2017). Experts’ versus laypersons’ perception of urban cultural ecosystem services. Urban Ecosystems, 20(3), 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0616-3

Romagosa, F. (2018). Physical health in green spaces: Visitors’ perceptions and activities in protected areas around Barcelona. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 23(March), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.07.002

Sabyrbekov, R., Dallimer, M., & Navrud, S. (2020). Nature affinity and willingness to pay for urban green spaces in a developing country. Landscape and Urban Planning, 194(December 2018), 103700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103700

Schaefer, M., Goldman, E., Bartuska, A. M., Sutton-Grier, A., & Lubchenco, J. (2015). Nature as capital: Advancing and incorporating ecosystem services in United States federal policies and programs. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 112(24), 7383–7389. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420500112

Schaich, H., Bieling, C., & Plieninger, T. (2010). Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 19(4), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.19.4.9

Shi, Y., Liu, J., Shi, H., Li, H., & Li, Q. (2017). The ecosystem service value as a new eco-efficiency indicator for industrial parks. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 164, 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.187

Silveira, I. H. da, & Junger, W. L. (2018). Espaços verdes e mortalidade por doenças cardiovasculares no município do Rio de Janeiro. Revista de Saúde Pública, 52(49), 9. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000290

Sturm, R., & Cohen, D. (2014). Proximity to urban parks and mental health. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 17(1), 19–24. Proximity to Urban Parks and Mental Health (nih.gov)

UN. (2019). World population prospects 2019. In Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects 2019. (Issue 423). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12283219

UN, Nations, U., & Division, D. of E. and S. A. P. (2018). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. In Demographic Research (Vol. 12). United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2005.12.9

Venter, Z. S., Barton, D. N., Gundersen, V., Figari, H., & Nowell, M. (2020). Urban nature in a time of crisis: Recreational use of green space increases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Oslo, Norway. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb396

Vidal, D. G., Oliveira, G. M., Pontes, M., Maia, R. L., & Ferraz, M. P. (2022). The influence of social and economic environment on health. In One Health: Integrated Approach to 21st Century Challenges to Health (1st ed., pp. 1–25). Academic Press - Elsevier. https://cfe.uc.pt/profile/publications/2232

Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., & Choi, S. (2020). Effects of physical and psychological factors on users’ attitudes, use patterns, and perceived benefits toward urban parks. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 51(April), 126691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126691

Woodruff, S. C., & BenDor, T. K. (2016). Ecosystem services in urban planning: Comparative paradigms and guidelines for high quality plans. Landscape and Urban Planning, 152, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.003

Wright Wendel, H. E., Zarger, R. K., & Mihelcic, J. R. (2012). Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.003

Xu, F., Wang, Y., Xiang, N., Tian, J., & Chen, L. (2020). Uncovering the willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation: A survey of the capital area in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162(June), 105053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105053

Zhang, H., Zhang, J., & Cai, L. (2022). Effects of Cultural Ecosystem Services on Visitors’ Subjective Well-Being: Evidences From China’s National Park and Flower Expo. Journal of Travel Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875221095219

Zhang, S., Liu, B., Zhu, D., & Cheng, M. (2018). Explaining Individual Subjective Well-Being of Urban China Based on the Four-Capital Model. SUSTAINABILITY, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103480

Zhang, S., & Zhou, W. (2018). Recreational visits to urban parks and factors affecting park visits: Evidence from geotagged social media data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180(18), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.004

Zhang, W., Yang, J., Ma, L., & Huang, C. (2015). Factors affecting the use of urban green spaces for physical activities: Views of young urban residents in Beijing. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(4), 851–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.006

Zwierzchowska, I., Hof, A., Iojă, I. C., Mueller, C., Poniży, L., Breuste, J., & Mizgajski, A. (2018). Multi-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services of parks in Central European cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 30(July 2017), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.017